as I know replay protection is still a concern. And since SegWit2xs first leg (i.e. It may also list the coin that does not attract the majority of total hash power, but the exchange has not given any guarantees yet, nor did it mention a name for this coin. But we dont believe in it yet and want to make the new users aware that Bitcoin is Bitcoin and not to get mislead also Bitcoin is not owned by anyone neither-Roger Ver. Bittrex will make all reasonable attempts to credit our users chain split tokens. Bitcoinity, and their stance on this naming issue. In a blog post published on October 13, BitMEX announced it would continue to list coins on the original chain as BTC. Het gaat hen mit programmieren geld verdienen blijkbaar helemaal niet over grotere blocks of segwit. While this technically does not mean SegWit2x itself won't proceed, it's extremely unlikely to be considered "Bitcoin" or "BTC" by anyone. Consider reading these fork posts to know the complete history of this event: When Is This Fork Happening? Bitcoin zou Bitcoin niet zijn als er toch weer een addertje onder het gras zit. What will you do with your SegWit2x coins, if you get them?
Understanding Segwit2x: Why Bitcoin s Next Fork Might Not Mean
Kraken bitcoin with paypal reddit, Bitcoin newsletter, How to take bitcoin payments,
Bitcoin Unlimited hard fork not SegWit2x. So why is this happening? Bitcoin Segwit2x is considered a "contentious" hard fork which has divided the Bitcoin community and may result in a chain split. Update, October 30th: It was pointed out to us that in a separate hard fork statement, Bitfinex does leave open the possibility of changing the tickers if "market forces suggest an alternative, more appropriate, wie fängt man an geld zu investieren labeling scheme for one or both chains.". The coins on the original chain will continue to be listed as BTC.